Notices
Porsche 911 The Porsche 911 (and all it's trimlines) is a famous, distinctive and durable car has undergone continuous development since its arrival in 1964. The 911 was developed as a more powerful, larger, more comfortable replacement for the Porsche 356.

Lowest Octane 911 will take

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-30-2008 | 06:58 PM
function12's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
From:
Default Lowest Octane 911 will take

I am looking at buying a 2003 or newer 911 non turbo. I have read the factory recommends 93 octane. Has anyone run 87 or 91?

Thanks,
Eric
 
  #2  
Old 07-30-2008 | 10:25 PM
carsnob's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 44
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

If you want to buy cheap gas, don't buy a Porsche. Try a Kia.
 
  #3  
Old 07-31-2008 | 02:54 PM
Big Bob's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 611
From:
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

I'm afraid Carsnob is right. Personally 93 is the minimum I would run. Being in the UK I do run my car on 99 and you notice the difference. The lowest I go is 95 and you can tell the difference from the 99.
Regards Big Bob
 
  #4  
Old 07-31-2008 | 04:21 PM
k2we's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 60
From:
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

It's premium or nothing for me. Sort of foolish to spend all that money on a great car and skimp on the gasolineto savea few bucks..

Steve in Saratoga Springs, NY
 
  #5  
Old 07-31-2008 | 10:04 PM
t32b's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 25
From:
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

+1
At the risk of sounding a bit harsh, it seems that if you can cover the cost of the Porsche, premium octane is not too much of a stretch. FWIW, and I could be rebutted by more knowledgeable experts on this forum, I do believe that the 997 (at least) will eat just about any fuel. It has a knock sensor and enough engine management computing power to adjust accordingly. But why would you?
Separately, on the 'wretched excess' end of the fuel spectrum, I just filled my 997S with 100 octane race fuel that my local service station happens to sell for relatively reasonable prices. I haven't had the chance to really test it under load - low rpm/high throttle setting, but it sure does seem to be running smoothly. Hardly a double blind test, but it sure is fun
 
  #6  
Old 08-01-2008 | 10:41 PM
bion's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 59
From:
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

In my part of Canada our premium gas is 91 octane and we all run our Porsches with no problem. If we can find higher octane at the track or in the US we indulge ourselves, of course!
 
  #7  
Old 08-02-2008 | 11:56 PM
carsnob's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 44
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

Actually in Ontario Sunoco premium is 94 octane. However in NY, Pa, Md, DC , the Sunoco max is 93.
Apparently the European ratings are comparable even though their numbers are higher but I don't know why that's the case...
 
  #8  
Old 08-05-2008 | 07:57 PM
function12's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
From:
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

I paying $4.60 for diesel now so it is not the price that is the question. I can remeber what show it was, maybe topgear, and they ran 87 octane in a 911 and it only lost 2 HP. They were saying most cars don't need or require the higher octane.
 
  #9  
Old 08-06-2008 | 03:07 PM
k2we's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 60
From:
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

Eric, Just read an article in last sundays paper about what octane your car really needs. There was a quote from Prosche saying there cars really don't need 93 Octane and they will run just fine on 87.. I'll try to find the complete article and provide a link..

Steve in Saratoga Springs, NY
 
  #10  
Old 08-13-2008 | 07:18 PM
SilverSpeeder's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Default RE: Lowest Octane 911 will take

I drive a 2001 911 Turbo and run it off 91 octane cause that is all that is available.
It runs like a dream. Would like to try 93 or higher and see if there is a difference, but right now I have no complaints.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.